BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//ILCB - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:ILCB
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.ilcb.fr
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for ILCB
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20220325T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20220325T140000
DTSTAMP:20260422T211706
CREATED:20220202T162241Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220207T144924Z
UID:17144-1648209600-1648216800@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:How do people interpret implausible sentences?
DESCRIPTION:  Martin Pickering (Department of Psychology\, School of Philosophy\, Psychology and Language Sciences) \nAbstract: \nPeople sometimes interpret implausible sentences nonliterally\, for example treating “The mother gave the candle the daughter” as meaning the daughter receiving the candle. But how do they do so? We contrasted a nonliteral syntactic analysis account\, according to which people compute a syntactic analysis appropriate for this nonliteral meaning\, with a nonliteral semantic interpretation account\, according to which they arrive at this meaning via purely semantic processing. The former but not the latter account postulates that people consider not only a literal-but-implausible double-object (DO) analysis in comprehending “The mother gave the candle the daughter”\, but also a nonliteral-but-plausible prepositional-object (PO) analysis (i.e.\, including to before the daughter). In three structural priming experiments\, participants heard a plausible or implausible DO or PO prime sentence. They then answered a comprehension question first or described a picture of a dative event first. In accord with the nonliteral syntactic analysis account\, priming was reduced following implausible sentences than following plausible sentences and following nonliterally interpreted implausible sentences than literally interpreted implausible sentences. The results suggest that comprehenders constructed a nonliteral syntactic analysis\, which we argue was predicted early in the sentence. \n 
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/martin-pickering/
LOCATION:FRUMAM\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR