BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//ILCB - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.ilcb.fr
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for ILCB
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20180325T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20181028T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20190331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20191027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190301T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190301T143000
DTSTAMP:20260419T110643
CREATED:20181123T114948Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152822Z
UID:1252-1551441600-1551450600@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Competitive neurocognitive networks underlying learning and memory: from stress to brain stimulation by Dezso Nemeth
DESCRIPTION:by Prof Dr Dezso Nemeth \nAffiliation: \n\nCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon\, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1\nIMÉRA\, Aix-Marseille Université\nHungarian Academy of Sciences\, Budapest\n\nHuman learning depends on multiple cognitive systems related to dissociable brain structures. These systems interact not only in cooperative but sometimes competitive ways in optimizing performance. Previous studies showed that manipulations reducing the engagement of frontal lobe-mediated explicit\, attentional processes can lead to improved performance in striatum-related procedural learning. Here I present four studies in which we investigated the competitive relationship between implicit statistical learning and frontal lobe-mediated executive functions.  Our result shed light not only on the competitive nature of brain systems in cognitive processes\, such as language\, learning\, and memory but also could have important implications for developing new methods to improve human learning.
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/dezso-nemeth/
LOCATION:Salle de conférences\, 5 avenue Pasteur\, Aix-en-Provence\, 13100\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20190328
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20190329
DTSTAMP:20260419T110643
CREATED:20181220T105845Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152815Z
UID:2054-1553731200-1553817599@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Understanding publication practices\, (models and time-courses) across disciplines to improve the impact of your inter-disciplinary research
DESCRIPTION:An inter-disciplinary discussion at ILCB\nIn our modern science practices\, it would not be surprising to hear that the three most important assets for a scientist are… publication\, publication\, publication! \nBut what exactly is a publication? The answer to this question could be very different across disciplines\, and many of its significant aspects are evolving. \nAcross disciplines\, the increment of knowledge is conceived and packaged in diverse formats (working papers\, proceedings\, monographies\, articles\, etc.) which are attributed vastly diverse value. \nAcross disciplines\, the relationship between the author\, the reviewers and the publishers can be vastly different. The business models of scientific publication have experienced major innovations in recent times\, and presumably more changes lie ahead. \nAcross disciplines\, the course of conception\, dissemination\, and archiving of a scientific contribution are practiced quite differently. The public discussion of findings can precede or follow publication. In some disciplines\, the predictions preceding an empirical study can now be archived in advance as pre-registrations\, which can be referred to later to clarify whether the authors observed exactly what they predicted or predicted exactly what they observed\, thus strengthening the impact of the contributions. \nThe inter-disciplinary “Institut Convergences ILCB” (Institute for Language\, Communication\, and the Brain) organizes a scientific discussion about current publication practices across disciplines. The issues above and related topics will be discussed by 4 specialist speakers. \nThis scientific discussion will have two goals. First\, to create common knowledge\, across practitioners of different disciplines\, of what their collaborators in other domains consider a scientific contribution. Second\, to reflect upon and hopefully improve the publication strategies of researchers. \nSchedule\n11h00 – 11h10: Motivations for this seminar by F.-Xavier Alario\, P. Blache\, E. Runnqvist (ILCB) \n11h10 – 11h50: Peer review across disciplines: from mutual ignorance to standards setting? by Didier Torny (Mines ParisTech – Paris) \n11h50 – 12h30: Registered Reports: A vaccine against bias in science and publishing by Chris Chambers (Cardiff University\, Editor of the journal Cortex) \n12h30 – 13h30: Lunch on site \n13h30 – 13h40: An insight into the publishing models in the Humanities and Social Sciences by  Sandra Guigonis (OpenEdition\, Centre pour l’édition electronique ouverte) \n13h40 – 14h20: Researchers regain control of their means of publication by Marie Farge (Ecole Normale Supérieure\, Paris) \n14h20 – 14h50: Round table (30 debate) \n14h50 – end:     Coffee\, discussions\, etc. \nAbstracts in the next page\nDidier Torny\, Peer review across disciplines: from mutual ignorance to standards setting? \nPeer review is often claimed as  the only way to provide certified knowledge to scientific communities and various audiences. However\, this very recent label includes a multitude of different\, even contradictory\, practices\, devices\, values. Interdisciplinary research\, and the existence large publishing groups around the world have first created unexpected meetings between once unique forms of evaluation and publication\, then some actors have tried to unify practices through different channels (guidelines\, technical infrastructure\, shared rules). The presentation will illustrate some contemporary examples of this rich history\, including questions of the anonymity of authors and reviewers and the introduction of post-publication peer review in journals. \n  \nChris Chambers\, Registered Reports: A vaccine against bias in science and publishing \nIn 2013\, Cortex became the first journal to offer Registered Reports\, a format of preregistered empirical publication in which peer review happens prior to data collection and analysis (see https://cos.io/rr/). The aim of Registered Reports is to overcome publication bias and various forms of researcher bias (e.g. selective reporting of statistically significant results and hindsight bias)\, by performing peer review in part before studies commence. Publishability is then decided by the importance of the research question and quality of the methodology\, and never based on the results of hypothesis testing. In this talk I will introduce the concept of Registered Reports and provide an update on its progress at at Cortex and beyond\, including its uptake by more than 150 journals\, including outlets in the Nature group\, generalist journals including Royal Society Open Science\, and emerging clinical trial formats. I will also discuss early evidence of impacts on the field and emerging Registered Report funding models in which journals and funders simultaneously assess proposed protocols. Together with a wide range of allied initiatives\, Registered Reports are helping to reshape the life and social sciences to place theory\, transparency and reproducibility at the forefront. \n  \nSandra Guigonis\, An insight into the publishing models in the Humanities and Social Sciences \nOpenEdition is a comprehensive digital publishing infrastructure at the service of scientific information in the Humanities and Social Sciences. It provides the academic communities with four publishing and information platforms: OpenEdition Journals (504 journals)\, OpenEdition Books (6\,775 books)\, Hypotheses (2\,870 Research blogs) and Calenda (41\,094 announcements of international academic events). The portal is thus a space dedicated to the promotion and dissemination of research\, publishing tens of thousands of scientific documents that promote open access\, while respecting the economic equilibrium of publications. It benefits therefore from a comprehensive overview on the publishing models in the HSS\, be it traditional practices or emerging trends. \n  \nMarie Farge\, Researchers regain control of their means of publication \nThe scientific edition is currently owned by an oligopoly of a few publishers\, who consider it an exceptionally juicy market. Thus\, scientists have lost control of their publishing tools and have become “cash cows”\, forced to produce ever more and faster…. I will explain how the “Gold Open Access” model\, designed by these publishers to preserve their market\, undermines scientific creativity and the public finances that support research. I will show how the “Green Open Access” model and the “Diamond Open Access” model\, designed by researchers to disseminate their publications\, avoid these perverse effects. I will present as examples the platforms https:// dissem.in and https://www.centre-mersenne.org/. \n 
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/understanding-publication-practices-models-and-time-courses-across-disciplines-to-improve-the-impact-of-your-inter-disciplinary-research/
LOCATION:Salle des voûtes\, St Charles\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR