BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//ILCB - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:ILCB
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.ilcb.fr
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for ILCB
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20170326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20171029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20180325T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20181028T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20190331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20191027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210129T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210129T160000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20210125T080348Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210125T080355Z
UID:6573-1611925200-1611936000@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Restitution projet étudiant.e.s MASCO 29 janvier
DESCRIPTION:L’équipe de l’UE ingénierie cognitive : \nL’UE ingénierie cognitive du Masco a changé de forme. Depuis la deuxième semaine de janvier\, les étudiant.e.s  et l’équipe du CREx travaillent sur un projet collaboratif impliquant l’analyse des tâches et l’organisation du développement d’un système. Les étudiants devront mettre en œuvre leurs connaissances sur des sujets proposés comme par exemple : \n– la mesure du rythme cérébral et extractions des fréquences référencées (alpha\, beta\,…) \n– le degrés de synchronie entre deux « inter actants » en mesurant extrayant des signaux physio (ECG\, EEG) \n– Une approche Art et NeuroPhysio\, mesurer l’effet du rythme (stimulation visuelle ou auditive) sur les signaux physio ou au contraire « sonifier » ou visualiser les variations des signaux cérébraux et physio \n– Mind control d’un mobile \n– La BCI \n  \nLe 29 janvier 2021 nous organisons la restitution du travail (examen) des étudiants à la salle des voûtes (Saint Charles) de 13 h 30 à 16 h (programme :  : https://filez.univ-amu.fr/q16ooumqhq). Le lien vers la retransmission de cet évènement est à la fin du mail. \nPour débuter cette séance de restitution\, nous aurons le plaisir d’accueillir\, en visio\, Camille Jeunet qui présentera une partie de ses travaux sur l’imagerie Mentale ainsi que sur l’utilisation de la BCI (Brain Control Imagerie) associée à la réalité virtuelle. Cette présentation sera suivie de la restitution par les M2 MASCO de leur projet développé pendant l’UE Ingénieur Cogniticien. Ces projets autour de casques EEG OpenBCI ont été développés par groupe de 4 à 6 étudiant-e-s. \nParticiper à la réunion Zoom\nhttps://univ-amu-fr.zoom.us/j/93929390495?pwd=RzBSOENrWkh0Tk1xNkJQT2JlNWE2QT09 \nID de réunion : 939 2939 0495\nCode secret : 290121 \n 
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/restitution-projet-etudiant-e-s-masco-29-janvier/
CATEGORIES:CREx
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20201127T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20201127T150000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20201119T091831Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201119T092118Z
UID:5332-1606485600-1606489200@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Understanding covert verbal actions as simulated verbal actions : Ladislas Nalborczyk \, ILCB
DESCRIPTION:Mental imagery of actions or “motor imagery” is accompanied by subjective multisensory (e.g.\, auditory\, visual\, kinaesthetic) experience. For instance\, while reading these words\, you may experience the auditory sensation of an “inner voice” accompanying your reading. Since the first explorations of the phenomenological and psychophysiological properties of such imagined actions\, there has been considerable efforts and progresses towards describing the mechanisms leading to these sensory percepts. An influential view suggests that these sensory percepts would result from the simulation or emulation of the corresponding motor action\, reusing internal models developed for the control of overt actions. However\, the precise computations required by these internal models (i.e.\, simulators or emulators) and their neural implementation is still unclear. Moreover\, the simulationnist view raises the question of how is it possible for imagination of action not to lead to overt execution. In other words\, despite the involvement of the motor system in providing the sensory experience of the covert action\, how can we imagine raising our arm without actually raising our arm? By focusing on imagined (i.e.\, covert) verbal actions as a case study\, we aim to better characterise the fundamental interplay between language\, action\, and perception. \n 
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/understanding-covert-verbal-actions-as-simulated-verbal-actions-2/
CATEGORIES:Seminars
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200903T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200903T190000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20200807T143423Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220920T133034Z
UID:3898-1599154200-1599159600@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Parallel orthographic processing and reading
DESCRIPTION:Parallel orthographic processing and reading \nJonathan Grainger (Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive\, CNRS & Aix-Marseille University Marseille) \nIn written languages that use an alphabetic script\, orthographic processing lies at the heart of the reading process\, enabling visual information to make contact with linguistic information. Indeed\, reading can be viewed as a bi-directional interaction between the processing of visual and linguistic information\, with orthographic processing serving as the crucial interface between the two. In the present talk\, I will summarize the knowledge that has accrued concerning orthographic processing in single word reading before presenting more recent research on sentence reading and the processing of orthographic information spanning several words. In both lines of research\, the key words are: parallel\, cascaded\, and interactive processing. For single word reading the interactivity involves position-coded letter identities and whole-word orthographic representations\, and for sentence reading it extends to involve ordered word identities and higher-level sentence structures. \n 
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/parallel-orthographic-processing-and-reading/
LOCATION:CIRM – Luminy\, 163 avenuede Luminy\, Case 916\, Marseille\, 13288\, France
CATEGORIES:Seminars
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200709T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200709T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20200625T101835Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200625T101839Z
UID:3841-1594292400-1594303200@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Modèles bayésiens de la cognition et du langage par Julien Diard et Jean-Luc Schwartz
DESCRIPTION:Dans la série « Les cours (dé-)confinés de l’ILCB »\, nous avons le plaisir de vous annoncer deux prochains cours en ligne sur les approches bayésiennes dans le domaine des intégrations sensori-motrices\, de la cognition\, et du langage. \nCours 1 : Introduction à la modélisation bayésienne en sciences cognitives \nRésumé : Les probabilités forment un outil très largement utilisé en sciences cognitives\, de l’hypothèse du « cerveau bayésien » aux modèles « bayes-optimaux » du traitement de l’information sensorielle\, en passant par les méthodes statistiques modernes. Dans cette première séance\, nous vous présenterons un aperçu de ces approches bayésiennes en sciences cognitives\, à travers différents exemples de modèles bayésiens du raisonnement\, de la perception\, et de la perception multi-sensorielle. \nDate : jeudi 2 juillet\, 11h-12h.\nLien d’accès : https://amuskype.univ-amu.fr/deirdre.bolger/QMMD5P3D \nCours 2 : COSMO\, un cadre computationnel pour la modélisation bayésienne de la communication parlée \nRésumé : Comment la modélisation bayésienne des processus cognitifs peut-elle nous permettre de répondre à des questions théoriques dans le domaine de la communication parlée ? Cette présentation aura la forme d’un TP en ligne\, de mise en application des principes vus dans le cours 1. Elle sera basée sur le modèle probabiliste COSMO (« Communicating about Objects using Sensori-Motor Operations »). \nDate : jeudi 9 juillet\, 11h-12h.\nLien d’accès : https://amuskype.univ-amu.fr/deirdre.bolger/KS2XG07T
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/modeles-bayesiens-de-la-cognition-et-du-langage-par-julien-diard-et-jean-luc-schwartz-2/
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200702T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200702T120000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20200625T101719Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200625T101719Z
UID:3839-1593687600-1593691200@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Modèles bayésiens de la cognition et du langage par Julien Diard et Jean-Luc Schwartz
DESCRIPTION:Dans la série « Les cours (dé-)confinés de l’ILCB »\, nous avons le plaisir de vous annoncer deux prochains cours en ligne sur les approches bayésiennes dans le domaine des intégrations sensori-motrices\, de la cognition\, et du langage. \nCours 1 : Introduction à la modélisation bayésienne en sciences cognitives \nRésumé : Les probabilités forment un outil très largement utilisé en sciences cognitives\, de l’hypothèse du « cerveau bayésien » aux modèles « bayes-optimaux » du traitement de l’information sensorielle\, en passant par les méthodes statistiques modernes. Dans cette première séance\, nous vous présenterons un aperçu de ces approches bayésiennes en sciences cognitives\, à travers différents exemples de modèles bayésiens du raisonnement\, de la perception\, et de la perception multi-sensorielle. \nDate : jeudi 2 juillet\, 11h-12h.\nLien d’accès : https://amuskype.univ-amu.fr/deirdre.bolger/QMMD5P3D \nCours 2 : COSMO\, un cadre computationnel pour la modélisation bayésienne de la communication parlée \nRésumé : Comment la modélisation bayésienne des processus cognitifs peut-elle nous permettre de répondre à des questions théoriques dans le domaine de la communication parlée ? Cette présentation aura la forme d’un TP en ligne\, de mise en application des principes vus dans le cours 1. Elle sera basée sur le modèle probabiliste COSMO (« Communicating about Objects using Sensori-Motor Operations »). \nDate : jeudi 9 juillet\, 11h-12h.\nLien d’accès : https://amuskype.univ-amu.fr/deirdre.bolger/KS2XG07T
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/modeles-bayesiens-de-la-cognition-et-du-langage-par-julien-diard-et-jean-luc-schwartz/
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200529T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200529T130000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20191104T160424Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220920T132714Z
UID:3085-1590750000-1590757200@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Zaven PARÉ
DESCRIPTION:Séminaire exceptionnel ILCB \nVendredi 29 Mai 2019\, 11h00\n \nProf. Zaven Paré\nSonzai-Kan and Cognition (Behavior Monitoring Interpretation for Interaction Design) \n\nLes capacités de jeu \n\nLa présentation porte sur les biais cognitifs dans des expérimentations mettant en jeu l’AI\, la robotique et l’interaction sociale (avec ou sans embodiment) dans 4 configurations de jeux avec 4 dispositifs. Les quatre parties de mon plan illustrent séparément les problématiques de l’anthropomorphisation de l’action et de l’interaction. \n\nLa force brute abstraite : le jeu de Go\nLa rapidité algorithmique : le rubik’s cube\nLa rapidité mécanique : pierre-papier-ciseaux \nLe potentiel social : les échecs\n\nATTENTION\, ce séminaire aura lieu en ligne. \nPour y accéder\, suivez le lien : https://amuskype.univ-amu.fr/thierry.chaminade/4HYYDS2N\nParticiper par téléphone : +33413554505\nID de conférence : 68560127\n \nVous aurez une petite installation à faire au préalable et des réglages de connexions\, qu’il faudrait faire dès à présent. Pour des raisons d’organisation\, prévoyez de vous connecter 10mns avant le début.\n\nBio\nActuellement résident de l’IMéRA\, Zaven Paré travaille en tant qu’artiste et chercheur en design d’interaction. Il a inventé la marionnette électronique (oeuvres présentes dans des collections en France\, en Suisse\, en Italie\, aux États Unis et en Russie). Ses dispositifs ont été utilisés dans des mises en scène de Valère Novarina (CalArts\, Festival Henson\, La Mama etc\, Festival d’Avignon). Il a été collaborateur de chorégraphes (Marie Chouinard\, Edouard Lock)\, pour le théâtre et le théâtre musical (Denis Marleau\, Mauricio Kagel) et pour le ballet et l’opéra (Het National Ballet\, Opéra Paris-Bastille). À partir de 2009\, il participe au Robot Actors Project du professeur Hiroshi Ishiguro\, dans le Intelligent Robotics Laboratory à l’Université d’Osaka et à ATR. \nIl a été lauréat du French American Fund for Performing Arts au California Institute for the Arts\, de la Villa Kujoyama\, de la Japan Society for Promotion of Science\, et l”invité d’honneur du dernier festival de marionnettes de Moscou. Il est l’auteur de  L’âge d’or de la robotique Japonaise (Paris: Les Belles Lettres\, 2016). \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n—
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/workshop-doctorants-et-post-doctorants-2/
CATEGORIES:Seminars
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20200519
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20200520
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20200130T161639Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220920T132604Z
UID:3337-1589846400-1589932799@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Journée ILCB (CANCELLED)
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/heidi-lyn-ph-d-university-of-south-alabama/
LOCATION:Salle de conférences\, 5 avenue Pasteur\, Aix-en-Provence\, 13100\, France
CATEGORIES:Journées de l’ILCB
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200327T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200327T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20200225T134834Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220920T132533Z
UID:3362-1585306800-1585317600@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Louis-Jean Boë GIPSA-lab\, UGA–CNRS\, Grenoble
DESCRIPTION:The Dawn of Speech is Older Than We Thought \n \nThe production of speech repurposes an entire set of anatomical features that are primarily used for vital functions: breathing\, sucking\, chewing and swallowing.  Hypotheses about the dawn of speech try to determine the period during which our ancestors began to produce\, by exaptation\, differentiated vocalizations associated with different social relationships. Anatomical and acoustic analyses of baboon vocalizations tend to show that the sounds themselves and the articulatory gestures that produce them are comparable to those of human vowels. If we interpret these vocalizations as audio fossils\, the beginnings of speech would date back more than 20 million years\, to the period when our ape ancestors separated from old world monkeys. The recent work that underlies this hypothesis invalidates a long controversy that motivated several multidisciplinary teams. By breaking the anatomical lock that claimed to restrict production of non-human primates’ vocalizations\, they have opened the doors to many avenues of research that had previously seemed blocked. \nL.J. Boë\, T.R. Sawallis\, J. Fagot\, P. Badin\, G. Barbier\, G. Captier\, L. Ménard\, J.-L. Heim\, J.L. Schwartz (2019) Which way to the dawn of speech?: Reanalyzing half a century of debates and data in light of speech science. Science Advances\, 5\, 12\, eaaw3916 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw3916 \nF. Berthommier\, L.J.\, Boë\, A. Meguerditchian\, T.R. Sawallis\, G. Captier (2018) Comparative Anatomy of the baboon and human vocal tracts: Renewal of methods\, data\, and hypotheses. In Origins of Human Language: Continuities and Discontinuities with Nonhuman Primates. Ed. by L.J. Boë\, J. Fagot\, P. Perrier\, J.L. Schwartz. Berne: Peter Lang.\nDOI :https://doi.org/10.3726/b12405 \nL.J. Boë\, F. Berthommier\, T. Legou\, G. Captier\, C. Kemp\, T. R. Sawallis\, Y. Becker\, A. Rey\, J. Fagot (2017) Evidence of a vocalic proto‑system in the baboon Papio papio suggests pre-hominin speech precursors. PLOS ONE 12\, e0169321 doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169321 \n 
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/louis-jean-boe-universite-grenoble-gipsa-lab-cnrs/
LOCATION:Salle des voûtes\, St Charles\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200207T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200207T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20191104T132335Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T151317Z
UID:3078-1581076800-1581084000@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Prof. Friedemann Pulvermüller (Freie Universität Berlin)
DESCRIPTION:Brain-language models\, prediction and the neural basis of communication
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/prof-dr-dr-friedemann-pulvermuller/
LOCATION:FRUMAM\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200124T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200124T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20191203T161709Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220920T131934Z
UID:3158-1579867200-1579874400@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Cerebral Processing of Voice Information: From Monkeys to Deep Learning
DESCRIPTION:Pascal Belin\, Institut de Neurosciences de La Timone\, CNRS & Aix-Marseille Université\, France \n————————— \nHow do we extract and process the treasure-trove of information in voices? Experiments involving techniques ranging from monkey neuroimaging to deep learning provide an increasingly detailed picture of the ‘vocal brain’ and its evolution in primates. Results suggest an organization in several ‘voice patches’ analogous to that of the face patch system.
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/prof-pascal-belin/
LOCATION:Salle des voûtes\, St Charles\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20191213
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20191214
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20191203T154757Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20191203T155000Z
UID:3153-1576195200-1576281599@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Journée Annuelle des Doctorants 2019
DESCRIPTION:ProgrammeJAD2019
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/journee-annuelle-des-doctorants-2019/
LOCATION:Salle de conférences\, 5 avenue Pasteur\, Aix-en-Provence\, 13100\, France
CATEGORIES:Workshop
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191211T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191211T170000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20191210T112635Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20191210T112906Z
UID:3224-1576069200-1576083600@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Rencontre recherches sur le jeune enfant
DESCRIPTION:Programme : \n13h Visite du BabyLab de la Maison de la Recherche (Fabrice Cauchard) \n13h45    Lola Rivoal et Maud Champagne Lavau (LPL)     Isabelle Dautriche (LPC) 15h Pause Café \n15h30 Abdellah Fourtassi (LIS)     Clément François (LPL)     Marianne Jover (Centre PsyCLE) \nLieu : Maison de la recherche\, 29 avenue Schuman\, salle 2.44 \nDate : 11 décembre\, 13h-17h \nContact : marianne.jover@univ-amu.fr
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/rencontre-recherches-sur-le-jeune-enfant/
LOCATION:Maison de la recherche\, 29 Avenue Robert Schuman\,\, Aix en Provence\, 13100\, France
CATEGORIES:Réunions
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191129T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191129T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20191031T143940Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152638Z
UID:3065-1575028800-1575036000@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:What we learn and when we learn it:  the interaction of maturation and experience in music and language
DESCRIPTION:What we learn and when we learn it: the interaction of maturation and experience in music and language \nVirginia Penhune\nDepartment of Psychology\, Concordia University\nLaboratory for Motor Control and Neural Plasticity\nhttps://www.concordia.ca/artsci/psychology/research/penhune-lab.html \nThe impact of training or experience is not the same at all points in development. Children who learn to play a musical instrument or speak a second language early in life are often more proficient as adults. In the domain of music\, a wealth of anecdotal evidence suggests that early training is important for musical skill\, however\, there has been little evidence directly demonstrating the impact of the age of start. To address this question\, work in my laboratory has compared behavior and brain structure in early- (<7) and late-trained ( >7) adult and child musicians\, showing differences in behavior and brain structure. More recently\, we have compared early- and late-trained musicians with simultaneous and sequential bilinguals\, showing differential effects of age-of-start in the arcuate fasciculus. I will discuss these findings in the context of our understanding of the interaction between normative development and specific experience\, and describe a model of gene-environment interactions that integrates the contribution of age of start.
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/what-we-learn-and-when-we-learn-it-the-interaction-of-maturation-and-experience-in-music-and-language/
LOCATION:FRUMAM\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191122T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191122T120000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20191031T144703Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152642Z
UID:3071-1574420400-1574424000@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Using Data Science to Study Children's Cognitive Development
DESCRIPTION:“Using Data Science to Study Children’s Cognitive Development” Abdellah Fourtassi \nFollowing the seminal work of Piaget\, the traditional approach in cognitive development has focused on studying the structure of children’s knowledge in controlled situations (e.g.\, laboratory experiments). While this approach allows for precise inference about how children behave in certain tasks\, it cannot provide an understanding of the social context within which knowledge emerges. In fact\, it has been known\, at least since Vygotsky\, that children acquire new skills and concepts with the help of more competent members of society who scaffold the children’s learning\, allowing them to attain skills that are just beyond their current abilities. In fact\, much of the children’s abstract knowledge about the world\, it has been argued\, is mediated through discussions with their parents/caregivers. \nIn this talk\, I explain how new advances in Data Science\, especially in Natural Language Processing (NLP)\, allow us to 1) account for what and how information is presented to children by their parents through language\, and 2) make precise predictions about the way this information can be used by children in controlled designs. Thus\, NLP can create a fruitful synergy between controlled and naturalistic research methods. More generally\, I argue that a complete theory of cognitive development requires interdisciplinary research across computer science and psychology.
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/3071/
LOCATION:Salle des voûtes\, St Charles\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191115T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191115T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20191031T144400Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152648Z
UID:3069-1573819200-1573826400@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Musicians at the cocktail party: Neural correlates of bottom-up and top down mechanisms
DESCRIPTION:“Musicians at the cocktail party: Neural correlates of bottom-up and top down mechanisms” \nRobert Zatorre\nMontreal Neurological Institute\nMcGill University \nSegregating sound mixtures makes demands on multiple cognitive and neural mechanisms that musical training may enhance or exploit. In a series of studies we have documented the music-related enhancement behaviorally in the context of speech in noise\, and also in a selective attention context with competing speech streams. Using functional MRI\, we observed that musicians’ enhanced speech-in-noise perception was associated with better decoding of speech in auditory areas at high signal-to-noise ratios (SNR)\, whereas under low SNR conditions the enhancement was associated with decoding in frontal and motor cortical regions. We interpret this finding as indicating a shift from bottom-up to top-down mechanisms depending on the quality of the input\, with musicians being better able to deploy either mechanism as a function of the conditions. We then used MEG to look at the neural representation of competing speech streams via decoding of the neural signature (amplitude envelope) of attended vs unattended items. The behavioral advantage associated with musical training was related to enhanced ability to represent both streams in auditory cortex\, consistent with their capacity to follow multiple sound streams in music. These cognitive neuroscience approaches help us to develop better models to explain why musicians are good at cocktail parties (apart from their reputed drinking abilities).
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/musicians-at-the-cocktail-party-neural-correlates-of-bottom-up-and-top-down-mechanisms/
LOCATION:Amphi MASSIANI\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13331\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191011T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191011T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20190913T124458Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152721Z
UID:2991-1570795200-1570802400@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Prospects for Collaborative Research between Latin Palaeography\, Cognitive Psychology and the Neurosciences
DESCRIPTION:Prospects for Collaborative Research between Latin Palaeography\, Cognitive Psychology and the Neurosciences \nTwenty years ago\, Brian Stock\, the distinguished Canadian historian of medieval literature and philosophy\, published Augustine the Reader\, a seminal resource for examining the patristic vocabulary for reading in the fifth century C.E.  The Latin verbs videre and inspicere came to be closely associated with\, and in some instances synonyms for the act of reading.  A survey of surviving manuscripts of the fifth and sixth century reveals remarkable dissimilarities between them and the papyri of the classical age of Cicero and Quintilian.  Codices\, not scrolls\, they incorporated patterns of space\, signs (notae)\, ink color (red and eventually blue\, green and yellow) and numerical annotations that facilitated the disambiguation of text and the extraction of meaning.  Changes in the patterns of inserted intra-textual space\, beginning with the cola et commata format perfected by Jerome for the Vulgate Bible\, are especially worthy of note.  These spatial innovations led to the aerated text format\, normal in the ninth century\, that I have described in Space Between Words. Speaking as a humanist who admires the “hard sciences”\, it appears to me that innovations in the neurosciences over the past two decades\, notably the ready availability of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)\, offers the possibility of developing experiments for scientifically analyzing in precise terms the impact of the evolving graphic innovations that from the fifth to the twefth centuries came to support the modern practice of silent reading.  My question today is: Is it now possible to formulate laboratory experiments capable of casting light on the psychological and neurological implications of the evolution of the Latin page that transpired between Antiquity and the central Middle Ages?  And if so\, what are the implications for analyzing the text format of Western European vernacular languages such as Irish and Old English? \n  \nPaul Saenger \nCurator of Rare Books emeritus\, The Newberry Library\, Chicago
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/prospects-for-collaborative-research-between-latin-palaeography-cognitive-psychology-and-the-neurosciences/
LOCATION:Salle de conférences\, 5 avenue Pasteur\, Aix-en-Provence\, 13100\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190702T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190702T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20190620T133059Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152714Z
UID:2833-1562068800-1562076000@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Brains in Harmony: the role of brain-to-brain synchrony in naturalistic social interactions
DESCRIPTION:Brains in Harmony: the role of brain-to-brain synchrony in naturalistic social interactions \nNeuroscience research has produced tremendous insight into how the human brain supports dynamic social interactions. Still\, laboratory-generated findings do not always straightforwardly generalize to real-world environments. To fill this gap\, I collaborate with scientists\, artists\, and educators to take neuroscience out of the laboratory\, into schools\, museums\, and underserved neighborhoods. We consistently find a relationship between brain-to-brain synchrony and successful social interaction. For example\, empathy\, joint action\, and social motivation predicts synchrony in dyadic interactions\, and synchrony among high schoolers is related to classroom social dynamics and student engagement. Taken together\, our multidisciplinary approach may provide a potential new avenue to investigate social interactions outside of the laboratory. \n  \nSuzanne Dikker (New York University Department of Psychology USA)
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/brains-in-harmony-the-role-of-brain-to-brain-synchrony-in-naturalistic-social-interactions/
LOCATION:Salle des voûtes\, St Charles\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20190620
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20190621
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20181108T101026Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190613T093011Z
UID:1053-1560988800-1561075199@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Inter-ACT:  A workshop on action and communication bridging psycholinguistics and social neuroscience
DESCRIPTION:9.20 Introduction to the Workshop \n9.30 Dr. Anna K. Kuhlen (Institute for Psychology\, Humboldt University of Berlin\, Germany) \nNeuro-cognitive studies on language production in shared task settings \nTypically\, people speak in the context of social interaction. Yet\, surprisingly little is known about how the neuro-cognitive processes of language production are shaped by social interaction. I will present experiments that investigate language production in settings in which two speakers jointly name pictures and take turns speaking and listening. Starting point are behavioral experiments demonstrating that speakers seek lexical access not only for pictures they name themselves but also for pictures named by a task partner– which can cause interference when subsequently naming semantically related pictures. Based on these findings I will discuss electrophysiological (EEG) experiments that aim to specify the mechanism behind such partner-elicited interference. Lastly\, I will present ongoing experiments that scale up joint picture naming to settings in which task partners speak to each other with communicative intentionality. In conclusion I will reflect on factors that may affect whether speaking is experienced as a joint activity. \n10.20 Prof. Emily Cross (University of Glasgow\, Scotland) \nPerceiving and Interacting with Artificial Social Agents \nUnderstanding how we perceive and interact with others is a core challenge of social cognition research. This challenge is poised to intensify in importance as the ubiquity of artificial intelligence and the presence of humanoid robots in society grows. My group’s research applies established theories and methods from psychology and neuroscience to questions concerning how people perceive\, interact\, and form relationships with robots. In this talk\, I review recent evidence from behavioural and brain imaging studies that aim to provide deeper insights into the relationship between social cognition and brain function. Examples from work comparing social perception of humans compared to robots highlights the importance of examining how perception of and interaction with artificial agents in a social world is revealing fundamental insights about human social cognition. \n11.10 Coffee break \n11.30 Dr. Guillaume Dumas (Institut Pasteur\, Paris\, France) \nSocial Neuroscience of Human-Human and Human-Machine Interaction \nHow are neural\, behavioural and social scales coordinated in real time so as to make possible the emergence of social cognition? Answering this question requires to study the dynamics of coordination in real human interactions. However\, even at the simplest dyadic scale\, methodological and theoretical challenges remain. First\, we will see how situated social paradigms combined with brain recordings of multiple individuals simultaneously (hyperscanning) allowed demonstrating how states of interactional synchrony at the behavioural level correlate with the emergence of inter-individual synchronisation at the brain level. Then\, we will discuss the Human Dynamic Clamp (HDC)\, a paradigm integrating equations of human motion at the neurobehavioral level in a virtual partner. Overall\, we will discuss how combining human-human and human-machine interactions thus presents new approaches for investigating the neurobiological mechanisms of social interaction\, and for testing theoretical/computational models concerning the dynamics at the neural\, behavioural\, and social scales. \n12.20 General discussion  \n13.00 – 15.00 Lunch \n15.00 Presentations of PhDs and Postdocs \n15.30 Round table reserved to PhDs and Postdocs \n17.00 End of the Workshop – Cheese and Wine \nOrganized by Giusy Cirillo\, Birgit Rauchbauer and Raphaël Fargier \n  \n 
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/workshop-organized-by-the-ilcb-blri-docpost-doc-group/
LOCATION:Salle de conférences\, 5 avenue Pasteur\, Aix-en-Provence\, 13100\, France
CATEGORIES:Workshop
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20190515
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20190518
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20181108T093356Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190626T105342Z
UID:1047-1557878400-1558137599@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Journées de l’ILCB / BLRI à Porquerolles
DESCRIPTION:Wednesday 15th \n\n14h-15h30 Introduction\, posters overview\n15h30-18h Poster session\n18h Apéritif\, concert\n\n  \nThursday 16th  \n\n9h30-12h30: Long thematic workshops\n\nMultimodal interaction\, social brain (Roxane Bertrand\, Magalie Ochs\, Driss Boussaoud\, Adrien Meguerditchian)\nMultimodal experimentations (coord. Jean-Michel Badier\, Thierry Legou)\nReading\, Writing\, Brain and Disorders: From theory to applications (coord. Jo Ziegler)\n\n\n\n\n14h-15h30: Short thematic workshops\n\nMachine Learning (Sylvain Takerkart\, Thierry Artières)\nConvergence\, synchronization (Noël Nguyen)\nVocal Brain (Pascal Belin)\n\n\n\n\n16h-17h: Focus talks\n\nEpilepsy and language (Agnès Trébuchon)\nSpatio-temporal inverse problems in EEG and MEG (Bruno Torresani)\n\n\n\n  \n\n17h-18h: Synthesis 1\n\nSynthesis of the “Reading and writing” workshop\nSynthesis of the “Vocal Brain” workshop\n\n\n\n  \nFriday 17th \n\n9h30-10h30: Focus talk\n\nData\, acquisition\, diffusion (Noël Nguyen\, Stéphane Dufau\, Olivier Coulon)\n\n\n\n\n10h30-12h30: Synthesis 2\n\nMultimodal interaction\nConvergence\nMultimodal experimentations\nMachine Learning
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/journees-de-lilcb-blri-a-porquerolles/
LOCATION:IGESA PORQUEROLLES\, Rue de la Douane\, Ile de Porquerolles\, 83400
CATEGORIES:Journées de l’ILCB
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.ilcb.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Porquerolles_resized2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20190514
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20190515
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20190108T152602Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190509T204312Z
UID:2067-1557792000-1557878399@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Special ILCB Workshop "Speech\, Language and the Brain"
DESCRIPTION:Special ILCB Workshop “Speech\, Language and the Brain” \nSalle des Voutes  – Faculté St Charles Marseille \n  \nSonja Kotz : Dept. of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology\, Maastricht University \nKen Pugh : President and Director of Research at Haskins Laboratories \nAnne-Lise Giraud : University of Geneva \nKarsten Steinhauer : School of Communication Sciences and Disorders\, Faculty of Medicine\, McGill University \n  \n\n9h – 9h45 Prof. Sonja Kotz : Cortico-subcortico-cortical circuitry involvement in perception and speech\n9h45 – 10h30 Prof. Kenneth R. Pugh : Building the literate brain: How learning to read depends upon\, and changes\, brain organization for spoken language.\n11h – 11h45 Prof. Anne-Lise Giraud : Speech processing with (and without) cortical oscillations\n11h45 – 12h30 Prof. Karsten Steinhauer : Eliciting ERP components for morphosyntactic agreement mismatches in grammatical sentences\n12h30 à 14h  Lunch\n\n  \nSpeech processing with (and without) cortical oscillations \nAnne-Lise Giraud \nPerception of connected speech relies on accurate syllabic segmentation and phonemic encoding. These processes are essential because they determine the building blocks that we can manipulate mentally to understand and produce speech. Speech segmentation and encoding might be underpinned by specific interactions between the acoustic rhythms of speech and coupled neural oscillations in the theta and low-gamma band. To address how neural oscillations interact with speech and intervene in phonological processing\, we use neurocomputational models\, and establish that recognition performance are generally better with than without neural oscillations. Based on these models we hypothesize that if low-gamma oscillations are disrupted speech perception might cause difficulties to map phonemic with graphemic representations when learning to read. Using MEG\, and EEG combined with fMRI\, and neurostimulation\, we found that dyslexia is associated with a specific deficit in low-gamma activity in auditory cortex\, and that this deficit alone accounts for several facets of the disorder. We further show that boosting 30Hz neural activity in left auditory cortex using transcranial alternative current stimulation selectively improves phonological performance and reading efficiency. Altogether these results suggest a causal role of oscillatory processes in speech perception. \n  \nCortico-subcortico-cortical circuitry involvement in perception and speech  \nSonja Kotz \nWile the role of the cerebellum\, less is known about its contributions to perception and speech. Considering temporo-cerebellar-thalamo-cortical circuitry and its respective connectivity patterns\, cerebellar contributions should be further explored across domains as they (i) simulate cortical information processing and (ii) compare expected and actual outcomes of stimulation\, leading to adaptation in cortical target areas. I will discuss frameworks and present empirical evidence encompassing action\, perception\, and speech in support of this idea. \n  \nBuilding the literate brain: How learning to read depends upon\, and changes\, brain organization for spoken language. \nKenneth R. Pugh \nThe development of skilled reading involves a major re-organization of language systems in the brain. We will present ongoing research from our lab on the genetic and neurobiological foundations of learning to read across writing systems\, with particular focus on bi-directional dependencies between brain pathways that are critical in linking spoken and written language.  Our research suggests that print/speech convergence in language cortex accounts for individual differences in reading outcomes in high and low risk learners. New longitudinal findings from our lab using computational models to better understand critical gene-brain-behavior connections in early language and speech motor development and reading and are discussed in detail (including new findings with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and multimodal brain imaging that reveals how excitatory and inhibitory neurochemistry moderates language and reading development in high risk children). Finally\, we discuss recent studies that extend this brain research into second language learning. \n  \nEliciting ERP components for morphosyntactic agreement mismatches in grammatical sentences \nKarsten Steinhauer \nFrench subject-verb agreement has specific properties relevant to the study of agreement processing\, which have not been systematically studied in the ERP literature. Furthermore\, there is increasing interest in ERP methods that do not rely on violation paradigms. Therefore\, we examined whether the auditory presentation of a grammatical sentence in French combined with a picture that doesn’t match its morphosyntactic features would elicit the same ERP components as in classic error-based paradigms. We created various cross-modal number (singular/plural) mismatches to elicit LAN-P600 for agreement mismatches (Molinaro et al\, 2011; Royle et al\, 2013) and semantic verb/action (rather than noun/object) mismatches to elicit N400s (Royle et al.\, 2013; Willems et al\, 2008). \nTwenty-eight French-speaking adults listened to sentences describing scenes depicted while their EEG was recorded. We varied the type and amount of number cues available in each sentence using two manipulations. First\, we manipulated the verb type\, using either verbs whose number cue was audible through subject (clitic) pronoun liaison (LIAISon verbs: e.g.\, elle/s aime/nt [ɛlɛm]/[ɛlzɛm] ‘she/they love’)\, or verbs whose number cue was audible on the verb ending (CONSonant-final verbs\, e.g.\, il/s rugi-t/-ssent [ilʁyʒi]/[ilʁyʒɪs] ‘he/they roars/roar’). Second\, we manipulated the sentence-initial context: each sentence was preceded either by a neutral context (e.g.\, In the evening) providing no number cue\, or by a subject noun phrase (NP\, e.g.\, Les lions [lelijɔ̃] ‘The lions’) containing a subject number cue on the determiner. Number mismatches were created through mismatches between the number of visually-presented agents and morphosyntactic number cues in the auditory stimuli. \nAccuracy for acceptability judgments was nearly at ceiling throughout our conditions (86.5% to 97.6%). As expected\, the semantic action/verb mismatch elicited classic N400s followed by additional negativities. Number mismatches in sentence-initial contexts elicited broadly distributed N400s followed by a P600\, suggesting that non-linguistic visual information can be immediately used (in less than 500 ms) to make strong predictions about appropriate linguistic representations. For number mismatches disambiguated on LIAIS verbs\, we observed an early-onset sustained anterior negativity (eAN)\, followed by a centro-parietal N400 and a P600\, indicating that eANs are not specific to phrase structure violations (Hasting & Kotz\, 2008; contra Friederici\, 2002\, 2011). CONS verbs elicited an eAN which faded due to an overlapping P600 and reappeared after the P600\, a pattern previously described for various syntactic violations in auditory ERP studies (Steinhauer & Drury\, 2012). Thus\, eAN and P600 temporarily cancelled each other out. The fact that the frontal negativity lasted beyond the P600 duration (as in previous auditory agreement studies\, e.g.\, Hasting & Kotz\, 2008) suggests that the P600 does not always reflect the final stage of sentence evaluation processes. \nThe present study demonstrates for the first time that perfectly grammatical sentences can elicit classic ERP components usually found in morpho-syntactic violation paradigms. We discuss how distinct psycholinguistic processes modulated the ERPs as a function of (1) number (singular vs plural mismatch) and (2) type of mismatch disambiguation (determiner\, LIAIS and CONS verb). Possible applications of this new cross-modal paradigm in developmental research will also be addressed. \n 
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/ilcb-workshop/
LOCATION:Salle des voûtes\, St Charles\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Workshop
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190426T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190426T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20190205T171756Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152809Z
UID:2189-1556276400-1556287200@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:In search for the cognitive foundations of Euclidean geometry ............................................................................................................................................ Towards processing theories of conversation
DESCRIPTION:11h Dr. Véronique Izard (Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center\, CNRS & Université Paris Descartes) : In search for the cognitive foundations of Euclidean geometry \n12h Prof. Antje S. Meyer (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics\, Nijmegen The Netherlands)  : Towards processing theories of conversation \n\n13h Lunch\nConfirm attendance (mandatory) by sending an email to lunchtalks@ilcb.fr\n\n  \nIn search for the cognitive foundations of Euclidean geometry \nEuclidean geometry has been historically regarded as the most “natural” geometry. Taking inspiration from the flourishing field of numerical cognition\, in the past years I have been looking for the cognitive foundations of geometry: Do children\, infants\, and people without formal education in geometry have access to intuitive concepts that bear some of the content of Euclidean concepts? Results have been mixed. In particular\, we found that angle\, a central tenant of Euclidean geometry\, is not intuitive for children. These results call into question the status of Euclidean geometry as a natural geometry. \n  \nTowards processing theories of conversation \nMost experimental research into spoken language has focused either on speaking or on listening.  However\, these processes should also be studied together\, not only because they naturally co-occur in conversation and likely affect each other\, but also because an integrated research approach can lead to novel insights into the architecture of the cognitive system supporting language use. I will provide an overview of a research program on speaking and listening in dyadic contexts. The starting point is the model of turn-taking in conversation proposed by Levinson and Torreira (2015). Though based exclusively on observational data the model makes strong processing predictions. A key claim is that speakers begin to plan their utterances as early as possible during their interlocutor’s turn\, in order to be prepared to respond quickly. Experimental evidence showed that speakers indeed begin to plan their utterances before the end of the preceding turn but\, contrary to the prediction\, not necessarily as early as possible. Rather than following a fixed rule (“plan as early as possible”) they appear to be quite flexible in their utterance planning. Current work aims at uncovering the factors that limit this flexibility. It appears that\, in addition to social and pragmatic factors that define the speaker’s processing goals\, capacity limitations arising in different components of the cognitive system play an important role. I will end by discussing how speakers might achieve smooth turn-taking without intensive linguistic dual-tasking.
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/ilcb-lunch-talk-by-antje-meyer/
LOCATION:Malmousque\, Chemin de la Batterie des Lions\, Marseille\, 13007\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20190328
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20190329
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20181220T105845Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152815Z
UID:2054-1553731200-1553817599@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Understanding publication practices\, (models and time-courses) across disciplines to improve the impact of your inter-disciplinary research
DESCRIPTION:An inter-disciplinary discussion at ILCB\nIn our modern science practices\, it would not be surprising to hear that the three most important assets for a scientist are… publication\, publication\, publication! \nBut what exactly is a publication? The answer to this question could be very different across disciplines\, and many of its significant aspects are evolving. \nAcross disciplines\, the increment of knowledge is conceived and packaged in diverse formats (working papers\, proceedings\, monographies\, articles\, etc.) which are attributed vastly diverse value. \nAcross disciplines\, the relationship between the author\, the reviewers and the publishers can be vastly different. The business models of scientific publication have experienced major innovations in recent times\, and presumably more changes lie ahead. \nAcross disciplines\, the course of conception\, dissemination\, and archiving of a scientific contribution are practiced quite differently. The public discussion of findings can precede or follow publication. In some disciplines\, the predictions preceding an empirical study can now be archived in advance as pre-registrations\, which can be referred to later to clarify whether the authors observed exactly what they predicted or predicted exactly what they observed\, thus strengthening the impact of the contributions. \nThe inter-disciplinary “Institut Convergences ILCB” (Institute for Language\, Communication\, and the Brain) organizes a scientific discussion about current publication practices across disciplines. The issues above and related topics will be discussed by 4 specialist speakers. \nThis scientific discussion will have two goals. First\, to create common knowledge\, across practitioners of different disciplines\, of what their collaborators in other domains consider a scientific contribution. Second\, to reflect upon and hopefully improve the publication strategies of researchers. \nSchedule\n11h00 – 11h10: Motivations for this seminar by F.-Xavier Alario\, P. Blache\, E. Runnqvist (ILCB) \n11h10 – 11h50: Peer review across disciplines: from mutual ignorance to standards setting? by Didier Torny (Mines ParisTech – Paris) \n11h50 – 12h30: Registered Reports: A vaccine against bias in science and publishing by Chris Chambers (Cardiff University\, Editor of the journal Cortex) \n12h30 – 13h30: Lunch on site \n13h30 – 13h40: An insight into the publishing models in the Humanities and Social Sciences by  Sandra Guigonis (OpenEdition\, Centre pour l’édition electronique ouverte) \n13h40 – 14h20: Researchers regain control of their means of publication by Marie Farge (Ecole Normale Supérieure\, Paris) \n14h20 – 14h50: Round table (30 debate) \n14h50 – end:     Coffee\, discussions\, etc. \nAbstracts in the next page\nDidier Torny\, Peer review across disciplines: from mutual ignorance to standards setting? \nPeer review is often claimed as  the only way to provide certified knowledge to scientific communities and various audiences. However\, this very recent label includes a multitude of different\, even contradictory\, practices\, devices\, values. Interdisciplinary research\, and the existence large publishing groups around the world have first created unexpected meetings between once unique forms of evaluation and publication\, then some actors have tried to unify practices through different channels (guidelines\, technical infrastructure\, shared rules). The presentation will illustrate some contemporary examples of this rich history\, including questions of the anonymity of authors and reviewers and the introduction of post-publication peer review in journals. \n  \nChris Chambers\, Registered Reports: A vaccine against bias in science and publishing \nIn 2013\, Cortex became the first journal to offer Registered Reports\, a format of preregistered empirical publication in which peer review happens prior to data collection and analysis (see https://cos.io/rr/). The aim of Registered Reports is to overcome publication bias and various forms of researcher bias (e.g. selective reporting of statistically significant results and hindsight bias)\, by performing peer review in part before studies commence. Publishability is then decided by the importance of the research question and quality of the methodology\, and never based on the results of hypothesis testing. In this talk I will introduce the concept of Registered Reports and provide an update on its progress at at Cortex and beyond\, including its uptake by more than 150 journals\, including outlets in the Nature group\, generalist journals including Royal Society Open Science\, and emerging clinical trial formats. I will also discuss early evidence of impacts on the field and emerging Registered Report funding models in which journals and funders simultaneously assess proposed protocols. Together with a wide range of allied initiatives\, Registered Reports are helping to reshape the life and social sciences to place theory\, transparency and reproducibility at the forefront. \n  \nSandra Guigonis\, An insight into the publishing models in the Humanities and Social Sciences \nOpenEdition is a comprehensive digital publishing infrastructure at the service of scientific information in the Humanities and Social Sciences. It provides the academic communities with four publishing and information platforms: OpenEdition Journals (504 journals)\, OpenEdition Books (6\,775 books)\, Hypotheses (2\,870 Research blogs) and Calenda (41\,094 announcements of international academic events). The portal is thus a space dedicated to the promotion and dissemination of research\, publishing tens of thousands of scientific documents that promote open access\, while respecting the economic equilibrium of publications. It benefits therefore from a comprehensive overview on the publishing models in the HSS\, be it traditional practices or emerging trends. \n  \nMarie Farge\, Researchers regain control of their means of publication \nThe scientific edition is currently owned by an oligopoly of a few publishers\, who consider it an exceptionally juicy market. Thus\, scientists have lost control of their publishing tools and have become “cash cows”\, forced to produce ever more and faster…. I will explain how the “Gold Open Access” model\, designed by these publishers to preserve their market\, undermines scientific creativity and the public finances that support research. I will show how the “Green Open Access” model and the “Diamond Open Access” model\, designed by researchers to disseminate their publications\, avoid these perverse effects. I will present as examples the platforms https:// dissem.in and https://www.centre-mersenne.org/. \n 
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/understanding-publication-practices-models-and-time-courses-across-disciplines-to-improve-the-impact-of-your-inter-disciplinary-research/
LOCATION:Salle des voûtes\, St Charles\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190301T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190301T143000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20181123T114948Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152822Z
UID:1252-1551441600-1551450600@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Competitive neurocognitive networks underlying learning and memory: from stress to brain stimulation by Dezso Nemeth
DESCRIPTION:by Prof Dr Dezso Nemeth \nAffiliation: \n\nCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon\, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1\nIMÉRA\, Aix-Marseille Université\nHungarian Academy of Sciences\, Budapest\n\nHuman learning depends on multiple cognitive systems related to dissociable brain structures. These systems interact not only in cooperative but sometimes competitive ways in optimizing performance. Previous studies showed that manipulations reducing the engagement of frontal lobe-mediated explicit\, attentional processes can lead to improved performance in striatum-related procedural learning. Here I present four studies in which we investigated the competitive relationship between implicit statistical learning and frontal lobe-mediated executive functions.  Our result shed light not only on the competitive nature of brain systems in cognitive processes\, such as language\, learning\, and memory but also could have important implications for developing new methods to improve human learning.
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/dezso-nemeth/
LOCATION:Salle de conférences\, 5 avenue Pasteur\, Aix-en-Provence\, 13100\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20190208
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20190209
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20181123T163647Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190212T150515Z
UID:1269-1549584000-1549670399@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Workshop Doctorants et Post-Doctorants
DESCRIPTION:Program  ILCB-day February 8th (Salle de voûtes\, St Charles\, Marseille) \nMorning dedicated to three group presentations by the PhD-students and post-docs of the ILCB followed by interactive discussions around transversal topics with all the members of the ILCB. \n9.30 – 10.30:  “Interactions” \n10.30 – 11.30: “Learning and networks” \n11.30 – 12.30: “Comparative approaches” \n12.30 – 14.00 LUNCH \nAfternoon devoted to the reflection and discussion around the topic of interdisciplinary research in cognitive science \n14.00: Keynote presentation on “Interdisciplinary research in cognitive science” by Daniel Andler (ENS\, Paris) \n15.00: Poster session: all ILCB members are invited to present a poster to fuel informal discussions amongst the members of the ILCB
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/workshop-doctorants-et-post-doctorants/
LOCATION:Salle des voûtes\, St Charles\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Workshop
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190125T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190125T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20181108T091947Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152827Z
UID:1045-1548410400-1548424800@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:ILCB Lunch-talk by Nuria Sebastian\, Ghislaine Dehaene
DESCRIPTION:10h00  Are human infants able to use symbols?\, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz\n11h00  Coffee\n11h20  The onset of bilingualism: Specificities in the first year of life\, Nuria Sebastián Galles\n12h20  Discussion\n13h00  Lunch \n\nAre human infants able to use symbols?\nHuman adults commonly use symbolic systems (e.g. speech\, numbers\, writing code\, algebraic formula) to represent aspects of the external world\, and they easily and flexibly go from symbols to objects and vice-versa. This “symbolic mind” might be related to a distinct human neural architecture\, in particular\, the expansion of the associative areas and the development of new long-distance fiber tracts\, such as the arcuate fasciculus. More efficient connections to and from the frontal lobe and a longer memory buffer may lead to the discovery of more abstract structures\, and ultimately enable to represent the external world with a symbolic system. \nThis neural architecture is in place at full-term birth and brain imaging studies have revealed that higher-level associative regions\, such as frontal areas\, are involved in infant’s cognition from start. We may thus expect that infants might share the same symbolic competence than adults and that they can easily learn labels to represent classes of objects. To support this claim\, I will present brain imaging data showing the infants’ structural and functional brain architecture and ERP data obtained through a new paradigm as a first step to test symbolic representations in the infant brain. \nGhislaine Dehaene-Lambertz\, INSERM U992\, Neurospin\, Saclay (France) \nThe onset of bilingualism: Specificities in the first year of life\nHow different is the process of language learning in infants exposed to two languages from birth? It was not so long ago when the available evidence pointed to a delay in language learning in bilinguals. At present\, a bulk of studies indicates the existence of specific adaptations to the process of language learning. In the present talk I will focus on the emergence of such adaptations during the first months of life. \nNuria Sebastian\, University Pompeu Fabra-Center for Brain and Cognition Department (Barcelone)
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/nuria-sebastian-ghislaine-dehaene/
LOCATION:Salle des voûtes\, St Charles\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190118T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190118T193000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20181205T102711Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190108T150619Z
UID:1713-1547805600-1547839800@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:PhD&post-doc welcoming day
DESCRIPTION:10-10.30: Welcome: \nbreakfast and introduction to ILCB PhD &post-doc group \n  \n10.00-11.30: group work session 1 \nGroups of the ILCB day February 8th  focusing on the cross cutting topics of the ILCB and “interdisciplinarity” \, 3 groups -interactions ; learning and networks; comparative approaches- with 3-4 members/group). The session will contain presentations of the same slides used for the meeting in October (1 per person introducing their research project)\, a discussion and elaboration of a preliminary common slide that connects all projects of the group. The idea is to end up with a presentation to be presented to the whole institute in February in which each person present their project in 5 minutes\, and someone introduces or concludes with the presentation of the group slide that highlights the commonalities of the projects (I.e.\, a common topic that is part of the ILCB research program) and the interdisciplinary way in which this topic is being addressed. \n  \n11.30-13.00: group work session 2: Work in different groups (45 minutes): preparation of questions to be discussed during each of the interventions of the publication day March 28th organized by Xavier Alario (e.g.\, preregistration\, open access\, replication crisis\, peer review system\, statistics thresholds etc.). Presentation of proposed questions and discussion across groups( 45 min)\, modifications in function of this and unification of format at the end of the session. \n13-14:  lunch buffet \n14-15.30: Work in groups session 3 (with coffee/dessert buffet): \nSame groups as in the morning: modification\, unification and streamlining of format of individual slides in function of previous session\, finalization of common slide \n15.30-16.00\nGroup presentations 1 \nInteractions \n16-16.30\nGroup presentations 2 \nLearning and networks \n16.30-17.00\nGroup presentations 3 \nComparative approaches \n17-20.00: Apéro \ntogether with the members of the conseil de direction
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/phdpost-doc-welcoming-day/
LOCATION:Malmousque\, Chemin de la Batterie des Lions\, Marseille\, 13007\, France
CATEGORIES:Program ILCB welcoming day
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20181208T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20181208T150000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20190212T161538Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152835Z
UID:2222-1544270400-1544281200@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Information-oriented and cross-language aspects on speech and cortical rhythms by François Pellegrino
DESCRIPTION:Information-oriented and cross-language aspects on speech and cortical rhythms by François Pellegrino (CNRS & Université de Lyon\, Dynamics of Language Lab UMR5596) \nDuring the last two decades a growing body of evidence has shown a close relationship between temporal structure of speech and neural oscillatory activities\, especially in the theta and gamma bands. More specifically\, several recent models suggest that the neural capacity to track speech dynamics and rhythmic patterns is crucial for speech processing and understanding. However\, it is well known that speech periodicity is limited and thus that the story is probably more complex than acknowledged previously.\nIn this talk I present results of a cross-language comparison of 17 languages in terms of syllabic speech rate\, Shannonian information rate and of their shared tendency to very unevenly distribute information among their segments and syllables. These results are discussed in the light of cortical rhythms in the theta band and I introduce a (very) speculative hypothesis stating that there may be a functional distinction between syllables whose role is to convey information and syllables whose role is to provide a rhythmic carrier entraining neural oscillations.
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/ilcb-lunch-talk-by-tecumseh-fitch-2/
LOCATION:Salle des voûtes\, St Charles\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20181116T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20181116T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20180808T074858Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152840Z
UID:509-1542369600-1542376800@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Les dysfonctionnements phonétiques et/ou phonémiques dans l’aphasie\, chez l’enfant et chez l’apprenant d’une langue seconde : Une tentative de simplification ? Erreurs\, Contraintes structurales et/ou Stratégies Palliatives by Jean-Luc Nespoulous
DESCRIPTION:Les dysfonctionnements phonétiques et/ou phonémiques dans l’aphasie\, chez l’enfant et chez l’apprenant d’une langue seconde : Une tentative de simplification ? Erreurs\, Contraintes structurales et/ou Stratégies Palliatives\nLa lésion cérébrale qui provoque une aphasie engendre certes ipso facto un déficit linguistique. Ce déficit ne se caractérise cependant pas\, dans la très grande majorité des cas\, chez ces patients\, par une « perte de compétence »\, comme l’avait cru R. Jakobson sur la base de données cliniques rapportées par d’autres (K. Goldstein et A.R. Luria\, en particulier) et très largement « sur-interprétées » par lui-même ! \nIl n’est qu’à voir\, pour s’en convaincre\, la variabilité des « erreurs » réalisées par un même patient (en situation de production de mots\, par exemple) pour constater que ses productions sont la résultante de problèmes de « performance » ou de « traitement »\, souvent comparables à ceux que peut connaître\, au quotidien quoique à un moindre degré\, tout locuteur non-aphasique (Cf. les travaux de V. Fromkin (1973)\, M. Garrett (1980).\nNous tenterons\, dans notre exposé\, de montrer en quoi les « erreurs » produites par les aphasiques – aux plans phonétique et phonémique –\, en dépit de leur variabilité intra-individuelle\, inter-tâches… – se trouvent néanmoins contraintes par les propriétés structurales de leur langue maternelle. \nJean-Luc Nespoulous \n(Professeur Emérite en Sciences du Langage Université de Toulouse Institut Universitaire de France)
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/les-dysfonctionnements-phonetiques-et-ou-phonemiques-dans-laphasie-chez-lenfant-et-chez-lapprenant-dune-langue-seconde-une-tentative-de-simplification-erreurs/
LOCATION:Salle des voûtes\, St Charles\, 3 place Victor Hugo\, Marseille\, 13001\, France
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20181012T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20181012T140000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20190212T153831Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T152843Z
UID:2211-1539345600-1539352800@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Aligning ears and mouths: the consequences of synchronizing heard and spoken language by David Poeppel
DESCRIPTION:12h Prof. David Poeppel\, Max-Planck-Institute Frankfurt &New York University\n•	13h Lunch\n•	Confirm attendance (mandatory) by sending an email to lunchtalks@ilcb.fr\n\n\nAligning ears and mouths: the consequences of synchronizing heard and spoken language\n\n\nThe brain has rhythms\, and so does speech. It is a fortuitous outcome of recent research that the temporal structure of speech and the temporal organization of various brain structures align in systematic ways. \n(One might ask\, of course: how could it have been otherwise?) \nThe role that oscillatory activity might play in perception and cognition continues to be elucidated through experiments of various types. \nAn empirical observation that is now well established is that the auditory system reliably ‘entrains’ to the temporal modulations of speech - although the underlying mechanisms and the functional relevance remain vigorously debated. \nHere I address the question of whether these widely discussed phenomena extend to the relation between perception and action. \nHow motor systems and perceptual systems interact has been a foundational question in psychology and neuroscience\, and on the basis of new behavioral and neural experiments on sensorimotor synchronization\, \nI will argue against my own previous positions and demonstrate an unanticipated and compelling role for synchronization of speech through the ears and speech through the mouth.
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/ilcb-lunch-talk-jean-luc-nespoulous-professeur-emerite-en-sciences-du-langage-universite-de-toulouse-institut-universitaire-de-france/
LOCATION:Amphithéâtre de CERIMED\, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin\, Marseille\, 13005
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20180921T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20180921T150000
DTSTAMP:20260409T152010
CREATED:20190212T160600Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200430T153027Z
UID:2216-1537531200-1537542000@www.ilcb.fr
SUMMARY:Processing time with our auditory system by Christian Lorenzi
DESCRIPTION:•	12h Prof. Christian Lorenzi\, CNRS & Ecole normale supérieure\, Paris\, France\n\n\nProcessing time with our auditory system\n\nDebate on how speech information is represented in the auditory system has revolved around the role of two neural/perceptual features encoding the temporal modulations of the acoustic signal (the “temporal envelope”\, ENV\, and “temporal fine structure”\, TFS)\, their relative contribution to intelligibility and how that might be degraded by lesions to the peripheral and central auditory system.\n\nWe will review psychophysical studies that investigated the development of ENV/TFS perception\, the effects of cochlear and central lesions\, and the relationship between ENV/TFS perception and speech intelligibility.\n\nOur results suggest that: i) the processing of ENV and TFS is “functional” by 6 months\, and fine-tuned by language exposure between 6 and 10 months\, ii) ENV is more important for speech identification\, whereas TFS is more important for the segregation of competing sound sources\, iii) reduced ability to process ENV and/or TFS explains deficits typically associated with cochlear and central damage and ageing.\n\n*References: *\n\nShamma\, S.\, & Lorenzi\, C. (2013). On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system. /Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\, 133\, /2818-2833/./\n\nLorenzi\, C.\, Debruille\, L.\, Garnier\, S.\, Fleuriot\, P.\, & Moore\, B.C.J. (2009). Abnormal auditory temporal processing for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal. /Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\, 125\, 27-30./\n\nLorenzi\, C.\, Gilbert\, G.\, Carn\, H.\, Garnier\, S.\, & Moore\, B.C.J.  (2006). Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. /Proceedings of the National Academy of Science/ /USA/\, /103(49)/\, 18866-18869.
URL:https://www.ilcb.fr/event/ilcb-lunch-talk-by-christian-lorenzi/
CATEGORIES:Lunch Talks
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR