Neurobiological models of language disagree about the degree of neural overlap between the speaking and understanding. ‘To investigate this open issue, participants (N = 37) were asked to name out-loud object names and passively listen to the same words — minimal pairs only differing in their first phoneme, alveolar as in ‘Talon’ vs. bilabial as in ‘Ballon’. For both language modalities, the motor cortex was activated topographically, i.e. with stronger tongue activity for alveolar words and stronger lip activity for bilabial words. The temporal cortex was activated in a distributed manner. These results strongly support Integration Models (e.g., Pulvermüller, 1999; 2018; Strikers & Costa, 2016), which posit shared word representations for language production and comprehension.

Dmitrieva, X., Anton, J.-L., Fairs, A., Ivanova, B., Sein, J., Nazarian, B.,
Dufour, S., Pulvermüller, F., Runnqvist, E., & Strijkers, K.
(2025). Cerebral Cortex, 35(10), bhaf275. —  @HAL

We all know that bibliometrics is no longer a thing…

Still, see how much choice you have next time you want to read an ILCB paper, all freely available on HAL!

We remind you that acknowledging ILCB support when it is due provides vital information about the dynamism of our institute; when you do so, you should also tag your HAL deposit to make it part of the ILCB HAL collection.

Straightforward instructions are available for wording acknowledgments and for HAL collection tagging.